Continue reading "Case Report: BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd v Konczak [2017] EWCA Civ 1188"
This post is only available to members.
Case Report: BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd v Konczak [2017] EWCA Civ 1188
Apportionment of liability; psychiatric injury; pre-existing illness ‘The tone of Underhill LJ’s judgment is that it will be difficult to convince a court that apportionment is not going to be possible.’ This case revisits the vexed question of divisibility of psychiatric (and other) injury. It is an employment case of wide importance and application. The …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Allen & ors v British Rail Engineering Ltd & anor [2001] EWCA Civ 242
- BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd v Konczak [2017] EWCA Civ 1188
- Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2015] EWHC 2301 (QB); [2017] EWCA Civ 151
- Dickins v O2 plc [2008] EWCA Civ 1144
- Holtby v Brigham & Cowan (Hull) Ltd [2000] EWCA Civ 111
- Rahman v Arearose Ltd [2000] EWCA Civ 190
- Sutherland v Hatton [2002] EWCA Civ 76
- Thaine v London School of Economics [2010] UKEAT/0144/10
- Thompson v Smiths Shiprepairers (North Shields) Ltd [1984] 1 QB 405
- Wright v Cambridge Medical Group [2011] EWCA Civ 669