Continue reading "Break Clauses: Rigour not reasonableness"
This post is only available to members.
Break Clauses: Rigour not reasonableness
Christopher Morris sets out the current position on advanced payment apportionments and the law of implied contractual terms ‘The decision in M&S has had a tangible effect on property law and real estate practice.’ Just over a year on from the Supreme Court’s decision in Marks & Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Aberdeen City Council v Stewart Milne Group Ltd (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 56
- Airport Industrial GP Ltd & anor v Heathrow Airport Ltd & anor [2015] EWHC 3753 (Ch)
- Ali v Petroleum Company of Trinidad and Tobago (Trinidad and Tobago) [2017] UKPC 2
- Attorney General of Belize v Belize Telecom Ltd [2009] UKPC 10
- Capron v Capron (1874) LR 17 Eq 288
- Ellis v Rowbotham [1900] 1 QB 740
- Hallman Holding Ltd v Webster & anor (Anguilla) [2016] UKPC 3
- KG Bominflot Bunkergesellschaft fur Mineraloele mbH & Co v Petroplus Marketing AG (The Mercini Lady) [2010] EWCA Civ 1145
- Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company Ltd [2013] EWHC 1279 (Ch); [2014] EWCA Civ 603; [2015] UKSC 72
- Mediterranean Salvage & Towage Ltd v Seamar Trading & Commerce Inc [2009] EWCA Civ 531
- Philips Electronique Grand Public SA v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd [1995] EMLR 472
- Shirlaw v Southern Foundries (1926) Ltd [1939] 2 KB 206
- The Moorcock (1889) LR 14 PD 64
- Trump International Golf Club Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers [2015] UKSC 74
- Vizcaya Partners Ltd v Picard & anor (Gibraltar) [2016] UKPC 5