Continue reading "Contract: Nohow or contrariwise"
This post is only available to members.
Contract: Nohow or contrariwise
Paul Brehony and William Gow consider the pendulum of case law in contractual interpretation ‘Parties should draft express provisions to clarify intention and not rely on pre-contractual representations or negotiations.’ In Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd v West Bromwich Building Society [1997], Leggatt LJ cited Alice Through the Looking Glass when rejecting the interpretation adopted by …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Arnold v Britton & ors [2015] UKSC 36
- Attorney General of Belize v Belize Telecom Ltd [2009] UKPC 10
- Idemitsu Kosan Co Ltd v Sumitomo Corporation [2016] EWHC 1909 (Comm)
- Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd v West Bromwich Building Society [1997] UKHL 28
- Irish Bank Resolution Corporation Ltd (In Special Liquidation) v Camden Market Holdings Corp & ors [2017] EWCA Civ 7
- Lehman Brothers International (Europe) v Exxonmobil Financial Services BV [2016] EWHC 2699 (Comm)
- Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company Ltd [2013] EWHC 1279 (Ch); [2014] EWCA Civ 603; [2015] UKSC 72
- Millen v Karen Millen Fashions Ltd & anor [2016] EWHC 2104 (Ch)
- Nobahar-Cookson v The Hut Group Ltd [2016] EWCA Civ 128
- Philips Electronique Grand Public SA v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd [1995] EMLR 472
- Prophet plc v Huggett [2014] EWHC 615 (Ch); [2014] EWCA Civ 1013
- Reda & anor v Flag Ltd [2002] UKPC 38
- Rush Hair Ltd v Gibson-Forbes & anor [2016] EWHC 2589 (QB)
- Sycamore Bidco Ltd v Breslin & anor [2012] EWHC 3443 (Ch)