Continue reading "Pre-Nuptials: No excuses"
Pre-Nuptials: No excuses
Camilla Thornton examines case law post-Radmacher where a party has sought to overturn the terms of a nuptial agreement ‘Only in cases where the parties’ circumstances have changed in a way that was not anticipated will the courts look carefully at the fairness of justifying a pre-nuptial agreement entered into some time ago.’ It has …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- B v S (Financial Remedy: Marital Property Regime) [2012] EWHC 265 (Fam)
- BN v MA [2013] EWHC 4250 (Fam)
- Edgar v Edgar [1980] EWCA Civ 2
- H v H [2016] EWFC B81
- Hopkins v Hopkins [2015] EWHC 812 (Fam)
- NG v KR (Pre-nuptial contract) [2008] EWHC 1532 (Fam)
- Radmacher v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42; WTLR(w) 2010-13
- Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge (AP) [2001] UKHL 44
- Xydhias v Xydhias [1998] EWCA Civ 1966