Continue reading "Orders For Payment: Arguments over the bill"
This post is only available to members.
Orders For Payment: Arguments over the bill
Nicholas Lee discusses the issues surrounding payments on account of costs ‘Where interim costs orders are to be subject to detailed assessment at the conclusion of the proceedings, there seems to be no reason in principle why the court cannot order a payment on account of such costs.’In April 2013 the provisions within the CPR …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Ashman v Thomas [2016] EWHC 1810 (Ch)
- Bim Kemi AB v Blackburn Chemicals Ltd [2003] EWCA Civ 889
- Blackmore v Cummings & Ors [2009] EWCA Civ 1276
- Dyson Ltd v Hoover Ltd [2003] EWHC 624
- Jeffrey Jones & Ors v The Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change & Coal Products Limited [2013] EWHC 1023 (QB) (03 May 2013)
- Mars UK Ltd v Teknowledge Ltd No 2 [1999] 2 Costs LR 44
- SARPD Oil International Ltd v Addax Energy SA [2015] EWHC 2426 (Comm); [2016] EWCA Civ 120
- Thomas Pink Limited v Victorias Secret UK Limited [2014] EWHC 3258 (Ch)
- Travers v Poole Hospital (1) NHS Foundation Trust (2) (06/06/16 DJ Baldwin