Continue reading "Variation: Challenging odds"
This post is only available to members.
Variation: Challenging odds
Daniel Sanders considers the courts’ approach to variation applications and the limited circumstances in which such an application is likely to succeed ‘A clear and highly compelling change in circumstances must have arisen in order to justify variation of the terms of the original maintenance order, whether as to quantum or term.’ For many clients …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Aburn v Aburn [2016] EWCA Civ 72
- Atkinson v Atkinson [1987] 3 All ER 849
- Chiva v Chiva [2014] EWCA Civ 1558
- Fleming v Fleming [2003] EWCA Civ 1841
- GN v MA [2015] EWHC 3939 (Fam)
- Kimber v Kimber [2000] 1 FLR 383
- Lauder v Lauder [2007] EWHC 1227 (Fam)
- Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24
- Roberts v Roberts [1968] 3 All ER 479
- SS v NS (Spousal Maintenance) [2014] EWHC 4183 (Fam)
- Vaughan v Vaughan [2010] EWCA Civ 349
- VB v JP [2008] EWHC 112 (Fam)
- Wright v Wright [2015] EWCA Civ 201