This post is only available to members.
Case Report: Hayden v Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust [2016] EWHC 1121 (QB)
Late surveillance footage; disclosure; fraud; expert evidence; adjournment ‘The suggestion that there should regularly be a date for the production of surveillance evidence is one to which the claimant’s advisers should give serious consideration.’ This case is an important illustration of the tension between the imperative of procedural discipline on the one hand and the …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Birch v Hales Containers Ltd [1996] PIQR P307
- Chartwell Estate Agents Ltd v Fergies Properties SA [2014] EWCA Civ 506
- Douglas v O'Neill [2011] EWHC 601 (QB)
- Dunbar Assets Plc v BCP Premier Ltd [2015] EWHC 10 (Ch)
- Gentry v Miller [2016] EWCA Civ 141
- Hayden v Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust [2016] EWHC 1121 (QB)
- Mills v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [1995] PIQR P324
- OLeary v Tunnelcraft Ltd [2009] EWHC 3438 (QB)
- Purser v Hibbs [2015] EWHC 1792 (QB)
- Rall v Hume [2001] EWCA Civ 146
- Uttley v Uttley [2002] PIQR P12
- Watson v MoD (2016) unreported; HHJ Yelton; 8 April