Continue reading "Non-Disclosure: The Watergate effect"
This post is only available to members.
Non-Disclosure: The Watergate effect
Max Lewis reflects on the impact of Sharland and Gohil and outlines the key points applied by the court in AB v CD ‘Inferences can be drawn from a failure to properly answer questions about post-order transactions that are adverse to what that party said about the position at the time of the order.’ It …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- AB v CD [2016] EWHC 10 (Fam)
- Bokor-Ingram v Bokor-Ingram [2009] EWCA Civ 412
- Gohil v Gohil [2014] EWCA Civ 274; [2015] UKSC 61
- Ladd v Marshall [1954] EWCA Civ 1
- Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd & ors [2013] UKSC 34; [2013] WTLR 1249 SC
- Sharland v Sharland [2014] EWCA Civ 95; [2015] UKSC 60