Continue reading "Enforcement: A rare bird"
This post is only available to members.
Enforcement: A rare bird
Lottie Tyler considers whether a court-appointed receiver may be an overlooked method of enforcement, not an unjustifiable expense ‘The possibility of an order appointing a receiver can be a substantial threat to wield against a respondent who is used to enjoying autonomy and control in all aspects of their life.’ The decisions in Sharland v …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Fuggle v Bland [1883] 11 QBD 711
- Gohil v Gohil [2014] EWCA Civ 274; [2015] UKSC 61
- IMK Family Trust: Re Mubarak v Mubarak & ors [2008] JRC 136
- Maughan v Wilmot [2014] EWHC 1288 (Fam); [2016] EWHC 29 (Fam)
- Mubarak v Mubarak [2000] EWHC 466 (Fam); [2007] EWHC 220 (Fam); [2007] EWCA Civ 879; [2008] JRC 136; [2009] WTLR 1543
- NG v SG (Appeal: Non-Disclosure) [2011] EWHC 3270 (Fam)
- Prest v Prest [2015] EWCA Civ 714
- Sharland v Sharland [2014] EWCA Civ 95; [2015] UKSC 60
- Young v Young [2013] EWHC 3637 (Fam)