Continue reading "Financial Provision: Continuum or new venture?"
This post is only available to members.
Financial Provision: Continuum or new venture?
Joanne Hall summarises the courts’ approach to post-separation growth in assets and the diverging views of the judiciary ‘The judgment in JB v MB reinforces that the law on post-separation accrual is highly fact specific and discretionary but must also be consistent and predictable.’ If the title of this article sounds like a Star Trek …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Charman v Charman (No 4) [2007] EWCA Civ 503; [2007] WTLR 1151 CA
- Cooper-Hohn v Hohn [2014] EWHC 2314 (Fam); [2014] EWHC 4122 (Fam); [2014] EWCA Civ 896
- JB v MB [2015] EWHC 1846 (Fam)
- JL v SL [2015] EWHC 360 (Fam)
- K v L (Ancillary Relief: Inherited Wealth) [2010] EWHC 1234 (Fam); [2011] EWCA Civ 550; [2012] WTLR 153
- Mallet v Mallet [1984] HCA 21
- Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24
- N v F (Financial Orders: Pre-acquired Wealth) [2011] EWHC 586 (Fam)
- Rossi v Rossi [2006] EWHC 1482 (Fam)
- SK v WL [2010] EWHC 3768 (Fam)
- White v White [2000] UKHL 54