Continue reading "Trusts: Following in the footsteps of Schmidt"
This post is only available to members.
Trusts: Following in the footsteps of Schmidt
Keith Robinson discusses a case concerning the disclosure of information to beneficiaries and the role of the protector ‘The Court of Appeal pointed out that the decision of whether or not to make disclosure under clause 9.2 is that of the trustees and not the protector (who only has a power of consent).’It is now …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- AN v Barclays Private Bank & Trust (Cayman) Ltd [2007] WTLR 565
- Armitage v Nurse [1997] EWCA Civ 1279
- Breakspear & ors v Ackland & anr [2008] EWHC 220 (Ch); [2008] WTLR 777 ChD
- In the Matter of An Application for Information About A Trust [2013] Bda LR 16; [2014] Bda LR 5
- Schmidt v Rosewood Trust Ltd [2003] UKPC 26; [2003] WTLR 565; [2004] WTLR 887