Continue reading "Rights Of Light: Questions and answers – part 4"
This post is only available to members.
Rights Of Light: Questions and answers – part 4
In the fourth of his continuing series, Andrew Francis considers how rights of light can be overriden, their abandonment and remedies in case of dispute ‘Ultimately whether there has been abandonment will be a question of evidence and the mere existence of blocked-up apertures is not the end of the story.’ Question 1 How can …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- CIP Property (AIPT) Ltd v Transport for London [2012] EWHC 259 (Ch)
- Coventry v Lawrence [2011] EWHC 360 (QB); [2012] EWCA Civ 26; [2014] UKSC 13
- Ford-Camber Ltd v Deanminster Ltd & anor [2007] EWCA Civ 458
- HKRUK II (CHC) Ltd v Heaney [2010] EWHC 2245 (Ch)
- Marine & General Mutual Life Assurance Society v St James' Real Estate Co Ltd [1991] 2 EGLR 178
- Midtown Ltd v City of London Real Property Co Ltd [2005] EWHC 33 (Ch)
- News of the World Ltd v Allen Fairhead & Sons Ltd [1931] 2 Ch 402
- Pavledes v Hadjisavva [2013] EWHC 124 (Ch)