Continue reading "TUPE: Who is in scope?"
This post is only available to members.
TUPE: Who is in scope?
Recent decisions highlight the need to consider carefully who is ‘in scope’ for the purposes of a TUPE transfer, warns Charles Wynn-Evans ‘The tribunal in McCririck v Channel 4 Television Corporation (1) and IMG Media Ltd (2) [2014] saw no rational basis for excluding workers, as distinct from employees, from the scope of TUPE, as …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Argyll Coastal Services Ltd v Stirling & ors [2012] UKEAT 0012/11/1502
- Botzen v Rotterdamsche Droogdok Maatschappij BV [1985] ECR 519
- Costain Ltd v Armitage [2014] UKEAT/0048/14
- Duncan Webb Offset (Maidstone) Ltd v Cooper & anor [1995] UKEAT 47/95/1506
- Edinburgh Home-Link Partnership v City of Edinburgh Council [2012] UKEATS/0061/11
- Edwards v Ericsson Limited (1) BT Managed Services Limited (2) [2014] Case no 1806030/2013
- Fairhurst Ward Abbotts Ltd v Botes Building Ltd [2004] EWCA Civ 83
- Linard v CT Plus Ltd (1) London Borough of Waltham Forest (2) Determination by the Deputy Pensions Ombudsman, 14 May 2013
- Marcroft v Hartland (Midlands) Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 438
- McCririck v Channel 4 Television Corporation (1) and IMG Media Ltd (2) [2014] Case no 2200478/2013
- Robert Sage Ltd t/a Prestige Nursing Care Limited v O'Connell & ors [2014] UKEAT/0336/13