Continue reading "Schedule 1: Missed opportunities"
This post is only available to members.
Schedule 1: Missed opportunities
James Brown suggests that Schedule 1 to the Children Act 1989 is underused and looks at the courts’ approach ‘Schedule 1 can be applied to small/medium-asset cases even if the result is that the absent parent will have to sell their property in order to house the applicant and the child.’ Family law practitioners are …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- DE v AB (Child: Financial Provision) [2010] EWHC 3792 (Fam)
- F v G (Child: Financial Provision) [2004] EWHC 1848 (Fam)
- H v C [2009] EWHC 1527 (Fam)
- KS v ND (Schedule 1: Appeal: Costs) [2013] EWHC 464 (Fam)
- M v V [2010] EWHC 1453 (Fam)
- Morgan v Hill [2006] EWCA Civ 1602
- MT v OT (financial provision: costs) [2007] EWHC 838 (Fam)
- PG v TW [2012] EWHC B36 (Fam); [2012] EWHC 1892 (Fam); [2014] 1 FLR 923
- Re C [2007] 2 FLR 13
- Re P (a child) (financial provision) [2003] EWCA Civ 837