Continue reading "Break Clauses: Breaking up is hard to do – part 3"
This post is only available to members.
Break Clauses: Breaking up is hard to do – part 3
Dan Cuthbert outlines where the recent decisions in Game and M&S leave apportionment of rent ‘Both the M&S and the Game appeal are good news for landlords. Tenants will find it increasingly difficult to argue that they should recover rent for any period after the exercise of a break date.’ Over the last two years, …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Canonical UK Ltd v TST Millbank LLC [2012] EWHC 3710 (Ch)
- Capital & City Holdings Ltd v Dean Warburg Ltd [1989] 1 EGLR 90
- Ellis v Rowbotham [1900] 1 QB 740
- Goldacre (Offices) Ltd v Nortel Networks UK Ltd [2009] EWHC 3389 (Ch)
- Leisure (Norwich) II Ltd v Luminar Lava Ignite Ltd [2012] EWHC 951 (Ch)
- Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company Ltd [2013] EWHC 1279 (Ch); [2014] EWCA Civ 603; [2015] UKSC 72
- PCE Investors Ltd v Cancer Research UK [2012] EWHC 884 (Ch)
- Pillar Denton Ltd & ors v Jervis & ors [2014] EWCA Civ 180
- Quirkco Investments Ltd v Aspray Transport Ltd [2011] EWHC 3060 (Ch)
- Re A Company [2007] BPIR 1
- Re Lundy Granite Co (1870-7) LR 6 Ch App 642
- Shackell & Co v Chorlton & Sons [1895] 1 Ch 378
- York v Casey [1998] 2 EGLR 25