Continue reading "Family Businesses: The golden goose"
This post is only available to members.
Family Businesses: The golden goose
Rebecca Stone reviews the case law relating to family businesses and the differing approaches taken by the courts to such assets ‘In F v F (clean break: balance of fairness) [2003] the judge accepted that where some of the assets are illiquid it may not be possible to achieve either the aim of equality or …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- A v A (ancillary relief: property division) [2004] EWHC 2818 (Fam)
- B v S (Financial Remedy: Marital Property Regime) [2012] EWHC 265 (Fam)
- C v C (variation of post nuptial settlement: company shares) [2003] EWHC 1222 (Fam)
- D v D & anor [2007] EWHC 278 (Fam)
- Evans v Evans [1990] 2 ALL ER 147
- F v F (Clean Break: Balance of Fairness) [2003] 1 FLR 847
- G v G (Financial Provision: Equal Division) [2002] EWHC 1339 (Fam)
- H v H [2008] EWHC 935 (Fam)
- Hamilton v Hamilton [2013] EWCA Civ 13
- Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24
- Myerson v Myerson [2009] EWCA Civ 282
- N v N (financial provision: sale of company) [2001] 2 FLR 69
- P v P (financial relief: illiquid assets) [2004] EWHC 2277 (Fam)
- P v P [2010] 1 FLR 1126
- R v R (financial relief: company valuation) [2005] 2 FLR 365
- R v R [2012] EWHC 2390 (Fam)
- V v V (financial relief) [2005] 2 FLR 697
- Wells v Wells [2002] EWCA Civ 476
- White v White [2000] UKHL 54