Continue reading "Financial Provision: Future proofing"
This post is only available to members.
Financial Provision: Future proofing
Camilla Thornton outlines the courts’ approach to income such as bonuses and how this may be reflected in an order for periodical payments ‘The inherent uncertainty of bonus payments provides, in part, the reason why the setting of a cap is essential in order to avoid the unintentional unfairness which may arise as a consequence …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- AR v AR (Treatment of Inherited Wealth) [2011] EWHC 2717 (Fam)
- B v S (Financial Remedy: Marital Property Regime) [2012] EWHC 265 (Fam)
- H v W [2013] EWHC 4105 (Fam)
- Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24
- VB v JP [2008] EWHC 112 (Fam)