Continue reading "Rectification: A case of doubt"
This post is only available to members.
Rectification: A case of doubt
Jennifer Seaman sets out the lessons to be learned from Re Hampel Discretionary Trust ‘It is important to get clear evidence as to the intentions of the parties to the trust deed or settlement up to the date of the deed or settlement and at the time the deed or settlement was executed.’ The remedy …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Allnutt v Wilding [2006] WTLR 1317 (Ch D); [2007] EWCA Civ 412; [2007] WTLR 941 (CA)
- Day & anr v Day [2013] EWCA Civ 280; [2013] WTLR 817 CA
- Futter & anr v HMRCC (with Pitt v HMRCC) [2013] UKSC 26; [2013] WTLR 977 SC
- Racal Group Services Ltd v Ashmore [1994] STC 416; [1995] STC 1151 (CA)
- Re Hampel Discretionary Trust 1999 [2013] WTLR 1405
- Thomas Bates & Sons Ltd v Windhams (Lingerie) Ltd [1980] EWCA Civ 3
- Walker v Armstrong (1856) 8 De GM & G 531