Continue reading "Leave To Remove: Best made plans"
This post is only available to members.
Leave To Remove: Best made plans
Kim Beatson and Lehna Hewitt look at recent decisions on leave to remove and the factors that will be taken into account by the courts ‘In Re B (Children) Thorpe LJ stressed that each case was fact-dependent and that the applicant’s explanation for the planned relocation would be at the core of every case.’ Holman …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- K v K (children) (removal from jurisdiction) [2011] EWCA Civ 793
- O (A Child) [2012] EWCA Civ 1955
- Payne v Payne [2001] EWCA Civ 166
- Poel v Poel [1970] 1 WLR 1469
- R v C [2013] EWHC 1295 (Fam)
- Re B (Children) [2004] EWCA Civ 956
- Re E (Relocation: removal from jurisdiction) [2012] EWCA Civ 1893
- Re TC and JC (Children: Relocation) [2013] EWHC 292 (Fam)
- S v T (Permission to Relocate to Russia) [2012] EWHC 4023 (Fam)
- S v Z (Leave to Remove) [2012] EWHC 846 (Fam)