Continue reading "Tenant: Plant and machinery considered"
This post is only available to members.
Tenant: Plant and machinery considered
Mark Pawlowski examines a recent case on the meaning of tenant’s fixtures in the context of a disputed claim to commercial plant and machinery ‘A tenant may only remove such objects as are classified in law as chattels or amount to tenant’s fixtures. Such removal, however, may sometimes be excluded by the express terms of …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Berkley v Poulett [1976] EWCA Civ 1
- Climie v Wood (1869) LR 4 Ex 328
- Deen v Andrews [1986] 1 EGLR 262
- Elitestone Ltd v Morris [1997] UKHL 15
- Hamp v Bygrave (1983) 266 EG 720
- Holland v Hodgson (1872) LR 7 CP 328
- Leigh v Taylor [1902] AC 157
- Mowats Ltd v Hudson Bros Ltd (1911) 105 LT 400
- Peel Land and Property (Ports No. 3) Ltd v TS Sheerness Steel Ltd [2013] EWHC 1658 Ch; [2014] EWCA Civ 100
- Pole-Carew v Western Counties and General Manure Co Ltd [1920] 2 Ch 97
- Spyer v Phillipson [1931] 2 Ch 183
- Webb v Frank Bevis Ltd [1940] 1 All ER 247
- Whitehead v Bennett (1858) 22 JP 257
- Young v Dalgety plc [1987] 1 EGLR 116