Continue reading "Victimisation: Back to square one"
This post is only available to members.
Victimisation: Back to square one
In its second ruling on the point in two months, the EAT has decided that post-termination victimisation remains unlawful after all, reports Hannah White ‘The EAT took further courage in its conclusion from the fact that, according to the ECJ in Coote, the UK is obliged under European law to provide protection from victimisation, including …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Coote v Granada Hospitality Ltd [1998] C-185/97
- Onu v Akwiwu [2013] UKEAT/0022/12; [2014] EWCA Civ 279
- Relaxion Group plc v Rhys-Harper [2003] UKHL 33
- Rowstock Ltd v Jessemey [2013] UKEAT/0112/12
- The Post Office v Adekeye [1997] ICR 110