Continue reading "Interim payments: Advance but with ‘disciplined and structured’ caution"
This post is only available to members.
Interim payments: Advance but with ‘disciplined and structured’ caution
Dr Jock Mackenzie and Richard Lodge provide their annual update on interim payments and the Eeles principles ‘It appears the issue causing the most contention between the parties and difficulty for the court is the need for an interim payment to fund the purchase and adaptation of a property.’ In the third of our annual …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Brown v Emery [2010] EWHC 388 (QB)
- Cobham Hire Services Ltd v Eeles [2009] EWCA Civ 204
- Crispin v Webster [2011] EWHC 3871
- FP v Taunton & Somerset NHS Trust [2011] EWHC 3380 (QB)
- Kirby v Ashford & St Peter’s Hospital [2008] EWHC 1320 (QB)
- Kirby v Ashford and St Peter’s Hospital NHS Trust (No 2) [2011] EWHC 624 (QB)
- Mabiriizi v HSBC Insurance [2011] EWHC 1280 (QB)
- Oxborrow v West Suffolk Hospitals NHS Trust [2012] EWHC 1010 (QB)
- Roberts v Johnstone [1989] 1 QB 878
- Sedge v Prime [2012] MHLO 66 (QB)
- Szatmari v Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust [2012] EWHC 1339 (QB)
- TTT v Kingston Hospital NHS Trust [2011] EWHC 3917 (QB)
- Wilson v Dummett & anor (Unreported 25 November 2011)