Continue reading "Practice: The long arm of the (common) law"
This post is only available to members.
Practice: The long arm of the (common) law
John Bennett contemplates the extent to which the common law can regulate the tendering process The recent case law has, if anything, added more confusion to the implied contract argument rather than determining those circumstances where it will apply and the precise scope of the doctrine.This article outlines the development of UK common law rules …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Attorney General of Belize v Belize Telecom Ltd [2009] UKPC 10
- Blackpool and Fylde Aero Club Ltd v Blackpool Borough Council [1990] EWCA Civ 13
- BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v President, Councillors and Ratepayers of the Shire of Hastings [1977] UKPCHCA 1
- ECAD v Comune di Torino [2008] ECR 1–03565
- Fairclough Building Ltd v Port Talbot BC (1992) 62 BLR 82
- Greville v Venables [2007] EWCA Civ 878
- Harmon CFEM Facades (UK) Ltd v Corporate Officer of the House of Commons [1999] EWHC Technology 199; [2000] 2 LGLR
- JBW Group Ltd v Ministry of Justice [2012] EWCA Civ 8
- Law Society v Legal Services Commission [2010] EWHC 2550
- Photo-Me International plc v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd [2011] EWHC 3168 (QB)
- Sidey Ltd v Clackmannanshire Council [2011] CSOH 194
- Telaustria Verlags GmbH and Telefonadress GmbH v Telekom Austria [2000] EUECJ C-324/98
- The Moorcock (1889) LR 14 PD 64