Continue reading "Financial Provision: Defining disclosure"
This post is only available to members.
Financial Provision: Defining disclosure
Patricia Robinson considers best practice when dealing with disclosure The parties’ duty to the court to provide full, frank and clear disclosure is absolute, and also a breach by commission is serious and amounts to plain perjury, whereas a breach by omission can be excused as an oversight. As set out in the Family Procedure …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Al-Khatib v Masry [2002] EWHC 108 (Fam)
- Baker v Baker [1996] 1 FCR 567
- E v E (Financial Provision) [1989] FCR 591
- F v F [1994] 1 FLR 359
- Hashem v Shayif [2008] EWHC 2380 (Fam)
- J-P C v J-A F sub nom J v J [1955] P 215, [1955] 2 All ER 617
- Livesey (formerly Jenkins) v Jenkins [1984] UKHL 3
- Lykiardopulo v Lykiardopulo [2010] EWCA Civ 1315
- NG v SG (Appeal: Non-Disclosure) [2011] EWHC 3270 (Fam)
- White v White [2000] UKHL 54