Continue reading "Leave To Remove: A storm in a tea cup?"
This post is only available to members.
Leave To Remove: A storm in a tea cup?
Chrissie Cuming Walters contemplates Re K one year on and recent government proposals on parental rights It has been nearly a year since the Court of Appeal handed down its judgment in Re K (Children) [2011] – a judgment initially seen as a potential game-changer in relation to leave to remove applications, if not somewhat …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- C v D [2011] EWHC 335 (Fam)
- Payne v Payne [2001] EWCA Civ 166
- Poel v Poel [1970] 1 WLR 1469
- Re AR (A Child: Relocation) [2010] EWHC 1346 (Fam)
- Re D (Leave to remove: Shared Residence) [2006] Fam Law 1006
- Re K (Children) [2011] EWCA Civ 793
- Re Y (Leave to Remove from Jurisdiction) [2004] 2 FLR 330
- Tyler v Tyler [1989] 2 FLR 158