Continue reading "Child Protection: Subjective reasoning"
This post is only available to members.
Child Protection: Subjective reasoning
Lauren Hall looks at recent case law regarding the correct approach to be applied upon an article 13b defence of risk of harm ‘The position after Re E was that a child would be returned if protective measures were sufficient to meet the risk of psychological or physical harm.’ One of the possible defences to …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Neulinger v Switzerland (Application 41615/07) [2011] 1 FLR 122
- Re D (A Child) (Abduction: Rights of Custody) [2006] UKHL 51
- Re E (Children) (Abduction: Custody Appeal) [2011] UKSC 27
- Re S (A Child) [2012] UKSC 10