Continue reading "Practice: A balancing act"
This post is only available to members.
Practice: A balancing act
Michael Morton reviews recent arguments on security for costs ‘A successful application for security can kill off a claim as the claimant struggles to put together the funds to meet the security requirements together with the funds needed for their own costs.’Even with a strong body of rules, regulations, guidance and case law, judicial decisions …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Allen v Bloomsbury Publishing Ltd & anor [2011] EWHC 770 (Ch)
- Aquilla Design (GRB Products) Ltd v Cornhill Insurance plc [1988] BCLC 134 (CA)
- Corfu Navigation Co v Mobil Shipping Ltd [1991] 2 Lloyd's Rep 52 (CA)
- Data Delecta Aktiebolag v MSL Dynamics Ltd [1996] ECR 1-4661
- Innovare Displays plc v Corporate Booking Services Ltd [1991] BCC 174
- Keary Developments Ltd v Tarmac Construction Ltd [1995] 3 ALL ER 534 (CA) (Civ Div)
- Lobster Group Ltd v Heidelberg Graphic Equipment Ltd & anor [2008] EWHC 413 (TCC)
- Mastermailer Stationery Ltd v Sandison & ors (2011) LTL 20/4/11
- Nasser v United Bank of Kuwait [2001] EWCA Civ 556
- Olatawura v Abiloye [2002] EWCA Civ 998
- Porzelack KG v Porzelack (UK) Ltd [1987] 1 ALL ER 1074
- Re Gibson's Settlement Trusts [1981] Ch 179
- Re Little Olympian Each Ways Ltd [1994] 4 ALL ER 561
- Sir Lindsay Parkinson & Co Ltd v Triplan Ltd [1973] 2 ALL ER 273 (CA)