Continue reading "Trusts: Different rules"
This post is only available to members.
Trusts: Different rules
Luke Barnes highlights the cohabitant cases that fall outside of the judgment in Jones v Kernott and the applicable case law ‘The claimant in sole name cases continues to face a stern test to establish a beneficial interest by virtue of an inferred common intention. In particular, it continues to be unclear what conduct may …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Abbott v Abbott [2007] UKPC 53; [2009] WTLR 1675
- Adekunle v Ritchie [2007] WTLR 1505
- Barrett v Barrett [2008] EWHC 1061 (Ch); [2009] WTLR 201
- Fowler v Barron [2008] EWCA Civ 377
- Gissing v Gissing [1970] UKHL 3
- Goodman v Gallant [1985] EWCA Civ 15
- James v Thomas [2007] EWCA Civ 1212
- Jones v Kernott [2009] EWHC 1713 (Ch); [2009] WTLR 1771; [2010] EWCA Civ 578; [2010] WTLR 1583; [2011] UKSC 53; [2012] WTLR 125
- Laskar v Laskar [2008] EWCA Civ 347
- Lloyds Bank plc v Rosset [1990] UKHL 14
- Morris v Morris [2008] EWCA 257
- Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17; [2007] WTLR 1053 HL
- Thomson v Humphrey [2009] EWHC 3576 (Ch)
- Webster v Webster [2008] EWHC 31 (Ch)