Continue reading "Probate: Family politics?"
This post is only available to members.
Probate: Family politics?
Morris v Davies is a reminder of the rules governing probate, domicile and anti-suit injunctions, as Edward Rowntree sets out ‘Any injunction prohibiting a claimant from bringing an action before a foreign court is regarded as constituting an unacceptable interference with the jurisdiction of the foreign court and, as such, is incompatible with the system …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Agulian v Cyganik [2006] EWCA Civ 129; [2006] WTLR 565
- Al-Bassam v Al-Bassam (no 3) [2004] WTLR 757
- Barlow Clowes International Ltd & ors v Henwood [2008] EWCA Civ 577
- Cadre SA v Astra Asigurari SA [2005] EWHC 2626 (Comm)
- Deutsche Bank AG & ors v Highland Crusader Offshore Partners LP & ors [2009] EWCA Civ 725 ?
- Holliday v Musa [2010] WTLR 839
- IRC v Duchess of Portland [1982] Ch 314
- Morris v Davies [2011] EWHC 1773 (Ch); [2011] WTLR 1643
- Seismic Shipping Inc v Total E&P UK plc [2005] EWCA Civ 985
- SNIA v Lee Kui Jak [1987] 1 AC 871
- Star Reefers Pool Inc v JFC Group Co Ltd [2010] EWHC 3003 (Comm); [2012] EWCA Civ 14
- Turner v Grovit [2001] UKHL 65; [2004] EUECJ C-159/02
- Winans v A-G [1904] AC 287