Continue reading "Evidence: Problem issues and problem clients"
This post is only available to members.
Evidence: Problem issues and problem clients
Lisa Sullivan and Martyn Mcleish offer practical tips on how to navigate claims where allegations of exaggeration may arise ‘The defence operates as a rule of public policy by which an otherwise perfectly proper claim will not be allowed to proceed or a particular head of loss cannot be recovered because it offends public conscience …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Caerphilly County Borough Council v Hughes (unreported) 6 December 2005
- Darg v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2009] EWHC 684 (QB)
- Douglas v O'Neill [2011] EWHC 601 (QB)
- Gray v Thames Trains & ors [2009] UKHL 33
- Isik v Clegg [2007] EWHC 2552 (QB)
- Kearsley v Klarfeld [2005] EWCA Civ 1510
- Molloy v Shell UK Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1272
- Morton v Portal Ltd [2010] EWHC 1804 (QB)
- Newman v Folkes [2002] EWCA Civ 591
- OLeary v Tunnelcraft Ltd [2009] EWHC 3438 (QB)
- Parsonage v Fastway Steel Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1796
- Rall v Hume [2001] EWCA Civ 146
- Revill v Newbery [1995] EWCA Civ 10
- Walton v Kirk [2009] EWHC 703 (QB)
- Widlake v BAA Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1256