Continue reading "Quantum: Minimising the value of special damages claims"
This post is only available to members.
Quantum: Minimising the value of special damages claims
Ben Hicks offers tips to defendants on how to attack schedules of loss ‘A counter schedule is the defendant’s opportunity to present its own interpretation of the evidence and to put forward its own calculation and assessments of the value of the claim.’ Whilst trite, it is worth starting any consideration of how to successfully …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- ATH & anor v MS [2002] EWCA Civ 792
- Clarke v Maltby [2010] EWHC 1201 (QB); [2010] EWHC 1856 (QB)
- Duller v South East Lincolnshire Engineers [1981] CLY 585
- Eagle v Chambers [2003] EWCA Civ 1107; [2004] EWCA Civ 1033
- Evans v Pontypridd Roofing [2001] EWCA Civ 1657
- Fish v Wilcox [1994] 5 Med LR 230
- Forey v London Buses Ltd [1991] 1 WLR 327
- Frost v Palmer [1993] PIQR Q14
- Giambrone v JMC Holidays Ltd [2002] EWHC 2932 (QB); [2004] EWCA Civ 158
- Hardwick v Hudson & anor [1999] EWCA Civ 1428
- Havenhand v Jeffrey [1997] EWCA Civ 1076
- Hogg v Doyle (unreported) 6 March 1991
- Hunt v Severs [1994] UKHL 4
- Johnson v Warren [2007] EWCA Civ 595
- Lowe v Guise [2002] EWCA Civ 197
- Mills v British Rail Engineering Ltd [1992] 1 PIQR Q130
- Newman v Folkes [2002] EWCA Civ 591
- Peters v East Midlands Strategic Health Authority [2009] EWCA Civ 145
- Smith v Manchester [1974] EWCA Civ 6
- Woodrup v Nicol [1993] PIQR Q104