Continue reading "Evidence: All the cards on the table"
This post is only available to members.
Evidence: All the cards on the table
Mike Wells and Donald McDonald consider recent cases on evidence and privilege ‘Documents that appear pertinent at first sight may, in fact, be irrelevant as a matter of law and so rendered inadmissible. A familiar example of irrelevance as a matter of law is the inadmissibility of evidence as to the parties’ subjective intentions for …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Akzo Nobel Chemicals v European Commission [2010] EUECJ C-550/07
- AM & S Europe Ltd v Commission [1982] ECR 1575
- BBGP Managing General Partner Ltd & ors v Babcock & Brown Global Partners [2010] EWHC 2176 (Ch)
- Dolphin Tanker Srl v Westport Petroleum Inc [2010] EWHC 2617 (Comm)
- Oceanbulk Shipping & Trading SA v TMT Asia Ltd & ors [2010] UKSC 44
- Phillips v Newsgroup Newspapers Ltd & ors [2010] EWHC 2952 (Ch)
- R (on the application of Prudential plc) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax [2010] EWCA Civ 1094; [2013] UKSC 1
- The Owners and/or Demise Charterers of the Dredger 'Kamal XXVI' and the Barge 'Kamal XXVI' v The Owners of the Ship 'Ariela' & anor [2010] EWHC 2531 (Comm)