Continue reading "Fiduciary Duties: The art of misdirection"
This post is only available to members.
Fiduciary Duties: The art of misdirection
Rachel Mainwaring-Taylor finds Aerostar a timely reminder of how directors must be aware of their duties when dealing with multiple companies ‘From a commercial point of view, that there is nothing preventing an individual from holding the office of director in more than one company. In such circumstances they will be obliged to act in …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Aberdeen Railway Co v Blaikie Brothers (1854) 1 Macq 461
- Aerostar Maintenance International Ltd & anor v Wilson & ors [2010] EWHC 2032 (Ch)
- Canadian Aero Service Ltd v O'Malley [1974] SCR 592
- Chan v Zacharia [1984] HCA 36
- CMS Dolphin Ltd v Simonet [2001] EWHC Ch 415
- Duke of Portland & ors v Lady Topham & ors (1864) 11 HLCas 32
- Furs Ltd v Tomkies (1936) 54 CLR 583
- In Plus Group Ltd v Pyke [2002] EWCA Civ 147
- Mothew (t/a Stapley & Co) v Bristol & West Building Society [1996] EWCA Civ 533
- Northstar Systems Ltd v Fielding [2006] EWCA Civ 1660
- Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver [1942] UKHL 1
- Twinsectra Ltd v Yardley & ors [2002] UKHL 12; [2002] WTLR 423 HL