Continue reading "Exiting The EU: The flaw in the Brexit white paper"
This post is only available to members.
Exiting The EU: The flaw in the Brexit white paper
The government’s failure to address the issue of purposive construction in its plan for the Great Repeal Bill will lead to uncertainty and a wave of litigation after Brexit, warns Sandy Kemp ‘Applying a purposive construction has led to significant differences of outcome, including a reversal of what decisions would have been using the standard …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- British Airways plc v Williams & ors [2012] UKSC 43
- Duncombe v Secretary of State for Children Schools and Families [2009] EWCA Civ 1355; [2011] UKSC 14; [2011] UKSC 36
- Edwards v Encirc Ltd [2015] UKEAT/0367/14/2302
- Fulton v Bear Scotland Ltd [2016] UKEAT/0010/16/0912
- Green v SIG Trading Ltd [2017] UKEAT/0282/16/2405
- Lawson v Serco Ltd [2006] UKHL 3
- Litster v Forth Dry Dock and Engineering Co Ltd [1988] UKHL 10
- Lyons v Mitie Security Ltd [2010] UKEAT/0081/09/1801
- Marleasing SA v La Comercial Internacional de Alimentacion SA [1990] EUECJ C-106/89
- Merino Gómez v Continental Industrias del Caucho SA [2004] EUECJ C-342/01
- NHS Leeds v Larner [2011] UKEAT/088/11; [2012] EWCA Civ 1034
- R (Hottak & anor) v The Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs & anor [2016] EWCA Civ 438
- Ravat v Halliburton Manufacturing and Services Ltd [2010] CSIH 52; [2012] UKSC 1
- Robinson-Steele v RD Retail Services Ltd [2006] EUECJ C-131/04
- Schultz-Hoff v Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund; Stringer & ors v Her Majestys Revenue and Customs [2009] EUECJ C-350/06 and C-520/06