Continue reading "Illegality And Trusts: Public policy or rule of law?"
This post is only available to members.
Illegality And Trusts: Public policy or rule of law?
Gareth Keillor and Rosanna Pinker consider the lack of clarification from the Supreme Court on the illegality defence ‘The mere existence of illegal activity will not be enough to defeat a claim; there must be a sufficiently close connection between that unlawful activity and the claimant’s pleaded case.’ The application of the illegality defence, otherwise …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Hniazdzilau v Vajgel [2016] EWHC 15 (Ch)
- Hounga v Allen [2012] EWCA Civ 609; [2014] UKSC 47
- Jetivia SA v Bilta (UK) Ltd & ors [2015] UKSC 23
- Les Laboratoires Servier v Apotex Inc [2012] EWCA Civ 593; [2014] UKSC 55
- Patel v Mirza [2014] EWCA Civ 1047; [2014] WTLR 1567 CA
- Patel v Mirza [2016] UKSC 42
- Stones v Rolls [2009] UKHL 39
- Tinsley v Milligan [1993] UKHL 3