Continue reading "Contract: No Rainy Sky over the Gower Peninsula"
This post is only available to members.
Contract: No Rainy Sky over the Gower Peninsula
Clare Arthurs and Sebastian Kokelaar examine the role of commercial common sense in the interpretation of contracts after Arnold v Britton ‘Arnold does not represent a radical departure from what was said in Rainy Sky about commercial common sense. Both decisions underline the primacy of the words used by the parties.’ In the case of …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Aberdeen City Council v Stewart Milne Group Ltd (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 56
- Antaios Compania Naviera SA v Salen Rederierna AB [1985] AC 191
- Arnold v Britton & ors [2012] EWHC 3451 (Ch)
- Arnold v Britton & ors [2013] EWCA Civ 902
- Arnold v Britton & ors [2015] UKSC 36
- Attorney General of Belize v Belize Telecom Ltd [2009] UKPC 10
- BMA Special Opportunity Hub Fund & ors v African Minerals Finance Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 416
- Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd & ors [2009] UKHL 38
- Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd v West Bromwich Building Society [1997] UKHL 28
- Rainy Sky SA v Kookmin Bank [2009] EWHC 2624 (Comm); [2010] EWCA Civ 582; [2011] UKSC 50
- Skanska Rashleigh Weatherfoil Ltd v Somerfield Stores Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 1732