Continue reading "Part 36: Humble offerings"
This post is only available to members.
Part 36: Humble offerings
David Sawtell analyses recent caselaw on Part 36 ‘There is a tension between the natural inclination to make a proportionate costs order where a party has lost on discrete issues and the prescriptive nature of Part 36.’Practitioners frequently debate tactics and strategy when negotiating the litigation and settlement of claims. One of the most important …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Altus Group (UK) Ltd v Baker Tilly Tax and Advisory Services LLP & anor [2015] EWHC 411 (Ch)
- Coward v Phaestos Ltd & ors [2014] EWCA Civ 1256
- Ford v GKR Construction [1999] EWCA Civ 3030
- Halsey v Milton Keynes General NHS Trust [2004] EWCA Civ 576
- Laporte v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2014] EWHC 3574 (QB); [2015] EWHC 371 (QB)
- PGF II SA v OMFS Company [2012] EWHC 83 (TCC); [2013] EWCA Civ 1288
- Sugar Hut Group Ltd & ors v AJ Insurance [2014] EWHC 3775 (Comm)
- Ted Baker plc & anor v AXA Insurance UK plc & ors [2014] EWHC 4178 (Comm)
- Uwug Ltd v Ball [2015] EWHC 74 (IPEC)
- Webb v Liverpool Womens' NHS Foundation Trust [2015] EWHC 449 (QB)