Assets Of Community Value: Mind the gaps

Simon Adamyk considers the gaps left in the legislation for the listing of land or buildings as assets of community value and suggests ways of addressing them ‘If the nominated asset meets the definition of an asset of community value (ACV) and the nomination comes from a group that is eligible to nominate an ACV, …
This post is only available to members.

Cases Referenced

  • Dorset County Council v Purbeck District Council [2014] CR/2013/0004, 16 January
  • Firoka (Oxford United Stadium) Ltd & anor v Oxford City Council [2014] CR/2013/0010, 9 May
  • Gullivers Bowls Club Ltd v Rother District Council [2014] CR/2013/0009, 24 April
  • Higgins Homes plc v London Borough of Barnet [2014] CR/2014/0006, 23 October
  • Matterhorn Capital Bristol Ltd v Bristol City Council & anor [2014] CR/2013/0006, 23 January
  • Patel v London Borough of Hackney & anor [2013] UKFTT CR/2013/0005 (GRC)
  • Ponnamma v Arumogam & ors [1905] UKPC 26
  • Quilter v Mapleson (1882) 9 QBD 672
  • R v Suffolk County Council, ex parte Steed (1996) 71 P&CR 463
  • Scott v South Norfolk District Council [2014] CR/2014/0007, 14 August
  • Spirit Pub Co Ltd v Rushmoor Borough Council [2013] CR/2013/0003, 22 November
  • Worthy Developments Ltd. v Forest of Dean District Council [2014] CR/2014/0005, 29 September