Continue reading "Jurisdiction: Tug of war"
This post is only available to members.
Jurisdiction: Tug of war
Tchenguiz-Imerman v Imerman [2013] highlights the tensions between courts of different jurisdiction, despite the principle of comity. Richard Tambling reports ‘The judge accepted that the interests of comity have a powerful place in cases involving offshore trusts when the English courts will often depend on the trusts’ home courts for assistance.’ This article considers what …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Browne v Browne [1989] 1 FLR 291
- In re M Trust [2012] (2) JLR 51
- Minwalla v Minwalla [2006] WTLR 311
- RK v RK (Financial Resources: Trust Assets) [2013] 1 FLR 329
- Tchenguiz-Imerman v Imerman [2012] EWHC 4277 (Fam)
- Tchenguiz-Imerman v Imerman [2014] WTLR 145
- Whaley v Whaley [2011] EWCA Civ 617; [2011] WTLR 1267 CA