Continue reading "Costs Awards: A review of recent case law"
This post is only available to members.
Costs Awards: A review of recent case law
Charles Wynn-Evans reports on some recent decisions on costs awards in the employment tribunal Under Rule 41(2), the tribunal is entitled, when deciding how to exercise its discretion to make a costs order, to take into account the relevant party’s ability to pay. The employment tribunal has the power to make a variety of orders …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- AQ Ltd v Holden UKEAT/0021/12 (
- Baker v Tote Bookmakers Ltd t/a Totesport UKEAT/0538/11 (
- Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council v Yerrakalva [2012] IRLR 78
- Boras Topic v Hollyland Pitta Bakery & ors UKEAT/0523/11 (
- Casqueiro v Barclays Bank plc UKEAT/0085/12; UKEAT/0086/12 (
- D'Silva v NATFHE UKEAT/0126/09 (
- Devis v Atkins [1977] AC 91
- Doyle v North West London Hospitals NHS Trust [2012] UKEAT/0271/11/0404
- Jackson v Walsall MBC UKEATPA/1247/10; UKEATPA/1430/10 (
- McPherson v BNP Paribas (London Branch) (No 1) [2004] IRLR 558
- Neary v St Alban's Girls' School [2010] ICR 473
- Oni v NHS Leicester City UKEAT/0144/12 (
- Peat v Birmingham City Council [2012] UKEAT/0503/11/1004
- Raggett v John Lewis plc UKEAT/0082/12 (
- Ridehalgh v Horsefield [1994] EWCA Civ 40
- West Midlands Co-Operative Society v Tipton [1986] ICR 192