Continue reading "Domicile: On the back foot?"
This post is only available to members.
Domicile: On the back foot?
Re Foote highlights the importance of domicile in our multi-jurisdictional society, as Suzana Popovic-Montag and Stuart Clark relate The choice of changing one’s domicile must be voluntary, not dictated by business, debt or health. The 2011 decision Re Foote Estate, of the Alberta Court of Appeal, centres around the issue of domicile. Leave to appeal …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Muscutt v Courcelles (2002) 60 OR (3d) 20 (ON CA)
- Re Foote Estate [2007] ABQB 654
- Re Foote Estate [2012] WTLR 1161
- Udny v Udny (1869) LR 1 Sc & D 441