Continue reading "Probate: Jarndyce revisited"
This post is only available to members.
Probate: Jarndyce revisited
Khan v Crossland reveals flaws in the current method of passing over executors, as Michael O’Sullivan discusses ‘HHJ Behrens rejected the submission made by the defendants’ counsel that the executors needed to disentitle themselves to a grant before an order under s116 SCA could be made.’ The decision in Khan v Crossland was made by …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- A-B v Dobbs & anor [2010] EWHC 947 (Fam); [2010] WTLR 931 FamD
- Buchanan v Milton [1999] 2 FLR 844
- Dobson v Heyman [2007] EWHC 3503 (Ch); [2010] WTLR 1151
- IRC v Stype Investments (Jersey ) Ltd [1982] 1 Ch 456
- Kershaw v Micklethwaite [2010] EWHC 506 (Ch); [2011] WTLR 413 ChD
- Khan v Crossland [2012] WTLR 841?
- Re Clore Deceased [1982] Fam 113
- The Thomas and Agnes Carvel Foundation v Carvel [2007] EWHC 1214 (Ch); [2007] WTLR 1297
- Watson v Perotti [2002] WTLR 913