Continue reading "Trusts: Divining intention"
This post is only available to members.
Trusts: Divining intention
Abigail Lowther considers sham trusts and their effect on financial claims ‘A sham must be a sham at the point of its creation – it cannot subsequently become a sham because of the changed intentions of one or both of the parties.’ In ND v SD [2017] Roberts J considered sham trusts, the beneficial ownership …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- A v A [2009] WTLR 1
- National Westminster Bank plc v Jones & ors [2001] 1 BCLC 98
- ND v SD & ors [2017] EWHC 1507 (Fam)
- Snook v London and West Riding Investments Ltd [1967] 2 QB 786
- Stone v Hitch & ors [2001] EWCA Civ 63