Last updateTue, 24 Feb 2015 5pm

CASE STUDY: Enforcement of planning obligations

30 August 2017  

Matt Hutchings QC considers some of the lessons to be learned from his experience of acting for the London Borough of Southwark when enforcing s106 agreements

I recently acted on behalf of the London Borough of Southwark, which brought claims in the Chancery Division to enforce affordable housing obligations imposed by s106 agreements. These claims were recently concluded by settlements approved by the High Court, and raised a number of legal issues of relevance to practitioners in this area, including:

Additional Info

  • Case(s) Referenced:

    Avon County Council v Millard (1985) 50 P&CR 275

    Bankway Properties Ltd v Dunsfold & anor [2001] EWCA Civ 528

    Eaton Mansions (Westminster) Ltd v Stinger Compania de Inversion SA [2013] EWCA Civ 1308

    J A Pye (Oxford) Ltd v South Gloucestershire DC & ors [2001] EWCA Civ 450

    London Borough of Enfield v Outdoor Plus Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 608

    London Borough of Newham v Ali & ors [2014] EWCA Civ 676

    Lunn Poly Ltd & anor v Liverpool & Lancashire Properties Ltd & anor [2006] EWCA Civ 430

    Pell Frischmann Engineering Ltd v Bow Valley Iran Ltd & ors [2009] UKPC 45

    Stadium Capital Holdings (No. 2) Ltd v St Marylebone Property Company & anor [2011] EWHC 2856 (Ch)

    Stroude v Beazer Homes [2006] EWHC 2686 (Ch)