Wed08232017

Last updateTue, 24 Feb 2015 5pm

JURISDICTION: Wherever I lay my hat

04 August 2017  

Elizabeth Wiggin and Jonathan Wood report on a recent ECJ decision

The European Court of Justice recently considered issues of jurisdiction under Art 7(1) of Reg No 1215/2012 (the Recast Brussels Regulation) for a reimbursement claim brought by one debtor against another regarding a credit agreement. The decision in Kareda v Benko [2017] provides clarification of the court’s jurisdiction under Art 7(1) of the Recast Brussels Regulation.

Additional Info

  • Case(s) Referenced:

    Ergo Insurance SE v If P&C Insurance AS; Gjensidige Baltic AAS v PZU Lietuva UAB DK [2016] EUECJ C-359/14; C-475/14

    Jakob Handte & Co GmbH v Traitements Mécano-chimiques des Surfaces SA [1992] EUECJ C-26/91

    Kareda v Benkö [2017] EUECJ C-249/16

    XL Insurance Company SE v AXA Corporate Solutions Assurance [2015] EWHC 3431 (Comm)