Last updateTue, 24 Feb 2015 5pm

JUDICIAL REVIEW: Standing tall

09 May 2017  

Stephen Sellers reports on recent case law on the ‘standing’ to apply for judicial review

In the recent case of Wylde v Waverley Borough Council [2017], five claimants attempted to challenge the variation of a development agreement using judicial review proceedings, on the grounds that it was in breach of the Public Procurement Regulations 2006, in relation to public works concessions.

Additional Info

  • Case(s) Referenced:

    Case C-454/06 Pressetext Nachrichtenagentur GmbH v Republik Österreich (Bund) [2008] ECR I-04401

    R (on the application of Chandler) v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families [2009] EWCA Civ 1011

    R (on the application of Faraday Development Ltd) v West Berkshire Council & anor [2016] EWHC 2166 (Admin)

    R (on the application of Gottlieb) v Winchester City Council [2015] EWHC 231 (Admin)

    R (Kathro & ors) v Rhondda Cynon Taff County Borough Council [2001] EWHC 527 (Admin)

    R (on the application of The Law Society) v Legal Services Commission & ors [2007] EWHC 1848 (Admin)

    R (on the application of Unison & anor) v NHS Wiltshire Primary Care Trust & ors [2012] EWHC 624 (Admin)

    Wylde & ors v Waverley Borough Council [2017] EWHC 466 (Admin)