Wed10182017

Last updateTue, 24 Feb 2015 5pm

PRE-NUPTIALS: No excuses

22 February 2017  

Camilla Thornton examines case law post-Radmacher where a party has sought to overturn the terms of a nuptial agreement

It has been five years since the Supreme Court held in Radmacher v Granatino [2010] that the court should give effect to a nuptial agreement that is:

Additional Info

  • Case(s) Referenced:

    B v S (Financial Remedy: Marital Property Regime) [2012] EWHC 265 (Fam)

    BN v MA [2013] EWHC 4250 (Fam)

    Edgar v Edgar [1980] EWCA Civ 2

    H v H [2016] EWFC B81

    Hopkins v Hopkins [2015] EWHC 812 (Fam)

    NG v KR (Pre-nuptial contract) [2008] EWHC 1532 (Fam)

    Radmacher v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42

    Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge (No 2) [2001] UKHL 44

    Xydhias v Xydhias [1998] EWCA Civ 1966

Last modified on 22 February 2017