Last updateTue, 24 Feb 2015 5pm

REMEDIES: A walk in the park

02 December 2016  

Kayleigh Bloomfield looks at Wrotham Park damages

Restrictive covenants may be instinctively characterised as belonging to the law of property. However, they can be a useful tool to utilise in employment contracts, partnership agreements, contracts of sale and commercial contracts more generally as a mechanism by which parties can impose negative stipulations upon one another in order to protect their commercial interests.

Additional Info

  • Case(s) Referenced:

    Abbar & anor v Saudi Economic & Development Company (Sedco) Real Estate Ltd & ors [2013] EWHC 1414 (Ch)

    Attorney General v Blake & anor [2000] UKHL 45

    Experience Hendrix LLC v PPX Enterprises Inc & anor [2003] EWCA Civ 323

    Force India Formula One Team Ltd v 1 Malaysia Racing Team Sdn Bhd & ors [2012] EWHC 616 (Ch)

    Morris-Garner & anor v One Step (Support) Ltd [2016] EWCA Civ 180

    Vercoe & ors v Rutland Fund Management Ltd & ors [2010] EWHC 424 (Ch)

    WWF – World Wide Fund for Nature & anor v World Wrestling Federation Entertainment Inc [2007] EWCA Civ 286

    Wrotham Park Estate Co Ltd v Parkside Homes Ltd [1974] 1 WLR 798